In the Schauer V

Multiple Choice

In the Schauer v.Mandarin Gems of California,Inc.case,the court held:

A) the plaintiff was entitled to proceed with her contract claim against the jeweler because the jeweler must have understood that she was an intended beneficiary of the sales contract.
B) both of the contracting parties must intend to benefit the third party to create a right to sue in the third party.
C) a specific manifestation by the promisor of an intent to benefit the third person is required to create a third party beneficiary contract.
D) the plaintiff was a donee beneficiary and, as such, she had no right to sue.