In the Case of Hooper V.Hooper,the Court Found

Multiple Choice

In the case of Hooper v.Hooper,the court found:

A) when the partnership was dissolved, one partner was entitled to property in kind in an amount by which his services had enhanced the value of the partnership.
B) when one partner unexpectedly became unable to contribute services and time to the partnership, there was an implied agreement that the other partner would be paid for the extra services he performed for the partnership.
C) the fact that one partner contributes greater skill and takes over management of a partnership business does not give rise to a right to extra compensation.
D) although the partners had an express agreement to pay one partner for extra services rendered to the partnership, such an agreement is unenforceable.