Multiple Choice
What did the justices rule in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004) ?
A) The actions of a president are not subject to judicial review.
B) The president does not have the authority to declare individuals to be "enemy combatants."
C) Hamdi was entitled to a lawyer and an opportunity to rebut the government's charges against him.
D) During the war, the president's power as commander-in-chief is unlimited.
E) The president has the power to suspend writs of habeas corpus under any circumstances.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q29: The written document in which attorneys explain
Q30: The doctrine of _ requires courts to
Q31: Most cases reach the Supreme Court through
Q32: Under normal rules of oral argument, each
Q33: When interest groups involved in litigation pursue
Q35: The assignment of the opinion in a
Q36: Why has partisan conflict surrounded federal judicial
Q37: Senatorial courtesy describes the practice of<br>A) senators
Q38: Aside from the justices themselves, who or
Q39: Which of the following was NOT a