Essay
Researchers in Los Angeles, CA, were interested in the predictors of aggressive driving. To investigate the potential antecedents of aggressive driving, these researchers developed a full-emersion driving simulator (i.e., in a real car adapted for a simulator, and with screens in all of the windows to resemble the available visual field one has in a car) where participants were subjected to several driving scenarios that reflected everyday driving situations in Los Angeles, including morning rush-hour, moderate traffic on a weekend, and busy nighttime driving. In other words, the driving simulator was designed to be as close to the real experience of driving as possible. Furthermore, the researchers were painstakingly thorough in making sure they recruited a sample of drivers that was representative of Los Angeles. The dependent variables were various observational and unobtrusive measures throughout the simulation (e.g., distance between the front of the participant's car to the rear of the car ahead of the participant; number and severity of fluctuations in speed; the amount of pressure applied to the gas and brake pedal). Is this study high in all three major aspects of external validity? Why or why not? Specifically, (a) identify and describe the major aspects of external validity, and (b) explain how and why the present study would be high or low on these three dimensions of external validity.
Correct Answer:

Answered by ExamLex AI
The major aspects of external validity i...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Answered by ExamLex AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q3: What types of participants are most likely
Q4: Study 1 investigated whether lack of sleep
Q5: In a field experiment, researchers experimentally manipulated
Q6: Researchers were interested in testing whether a
Q7: In a double-blind study examining the effects
Q9: If you conduct a field study in
Q10: Experimenters can unknowingly influence the results of
Q11: Providing an explanation of the goals of
Q12: In Milgram's (1963; 1965) obedience experiments, participants
Q13: Researchers were interested in determining whether feelings