Essay
You conducted a laboratory experiment investigating the effects of a perspective taking intervention on participants' attitudes toward outgroup members (e.g., if participants were Democrats, outgroup members would be Republicans). You created a new measure of prejudice because you could not find a previous validated prejudice scale. Your results indicated that at Time 1, prejudice scores were similar for the treatment and control groups, while at Time 2, prejudice scores were slightly, but significantly, lower in the control group, rather than in the treatment group. How could that be - could there be something wrong with the way you measured prejudice? Specifically, how might our knowledge of measurement validity explain these results? Discuss the different aspects of measurement validity and how they could have impacted your results.
Correct Answer:

Answered by ExamLex AI
There are several aspects of measurement...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Answered by ExamLex AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q8: Generating a large pool of items, consulting
Q9: Once a scale has been determined to
Q10: Your advisor asked you to test the
Q11: When using self-report measures, researchers risk having
Q12: Which of the following is NOT a
Q14: Delroy Paulhus and colleagues (e.g., Paulhus &
Q15: "Measurement construct validity" includes which of the
Q16: Two researchers wanted to determine if their
Q17: What are the five threats to measurement
Q18: When developing a scale that assesses teenagers'