Essay
Currently, some countries do not require IRB approval before you can conduct research with human participants, nor do these countries have any sort of review entities that are equivalent to an Institutional Review Board. At a recent conference, a fellow researcher suggested you consider conducting research in one such country (i.e., Methodia [a fictional country used for the sake of argument]), to avoid the overly burdensome and excessive red tape of your institution's IRB. Technically, this would not violate federal guidelines for participant protections if you did not represent yourself as a member of your home institution - so you decide to do it. What are the ethical implications of such a practice? Is what you are doing ethical - why or why not? How might this impact the process and integrity of conducting research in the US and at your home institution, both for yourself and for other researchers?
Correct Answer:

Answered by ExamLex AI
Conducting research in a country that do...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Answered by ExamLex AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q11: Besides the blatantly obvious examples of ethical
Q12: (a) What is one argument in favor
Q13: Why have some scientists argued that racial
Q14: What are some solutions to the ethical
Q15: The Internet offers many new opportunities to
Q16: What is informed consent, and why is
Q17: Why is outside funding (e.g., from a
Q18: If federal guidelines dictate that participants provide
Q19: (a) What is an Institutional Review Board,
Q21: You conducted a study that investigated whether