Multiple Choice
Researchers conducted a meta-analysis on the relationship between Z and X, and found a summary effect size of -0.08, p > 0.05, even though all of the individual effect sizes were highly significant. What could be potential reasons for this observed summary effect size?
A) they may have included too few primary studies in their meta-analysis, and thus their meta-analysis is underpowered
B) the distribution of effect sizes if very heterogeneous, with positive and negative individual effect sizes cancelling each other out
C) there may be an important moderator that is masking the true relationship between Z and X
D) A and B
E) B and C
F) all of the above
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q16: Describe the difference between fixed-effect models and
Q17: Which of the following limitations with narrative
Q18: At the outset of a meta-analysis (i.e.,
Q19: What is the "file drawer problem?" Why
Q20: In meta-analysis, weighting procedures are applied to
Q22: In a random-effects model, the summary effect
Q23: In meta-analyses, which of the following examples
Q24: A meta-analysis synthesized studies examining an independent
Q25: Define each the following methods of research
Q26: After converting everything to the appropriate statistics,