Multiple Choice
In considering the admissibility of testimony relating to out-of-court tests made from saliva samples that the defendant was required to give to the investigators, courts have generally held that:
A) this evidence is inadmissible because it violates self-incrimination provisions.
B) such evidence is inadmissible because it violates the best evidence test.
C) the privilege against self-incrimination offers no protection against the use of such evidence.
D) evidence is not admissible if the test was made out of court, but is admissible if the test is made in court and warnings have been given.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q19: Describe the deoxyribonucleic acid
Q20: What constitutional provisions are usually referred to
Q21: In the City of Cleveland Heights v.
Q22: What is the purpose of implied consent
Q23: Researchers have made a significant breakthrough in
Q25: Through the use of DNA evidence, a
Q26: How does the "truth serum" procedure differ
Q27: Testimony relating to the results of ballistics
Q28: What was the basic holding in the
Q29: Implied consent statutes providing for revocation of