Essay
In McKeehan v. State, defendant McKeehan was found guilty of robbery with a firearm, grand theft, aggravated assault with a firearm, and kidnapping with intent to commit a felony. All of these crimes were allegedly committed at a Sleep Inn Motel in Orlando. An officer was permitted to orally identify the defendant from a security video at a different motel from where the crimes occurred. The video from the other motel was not shown. On appeal, McKeehan asserted that the trial court committed error in violating the best evidence rule by allowing the state to use oral testimony to prove the contents of a videotape (a writing), rather than with the tape itself. Did the appellate court affirm or reverse based on the admission of the officer's statements? Did this practice violate the best evidence rule? Why or why not? Would the harmless error rule help the government?
Correct Answer:

Answered by ExamLex AI
The appellate court affirmed the trial c...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Answered by ExamLex AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q5: In some instances, authenticity is taken as
Q6: Unless documents are self-authenticating, a foundation must
Q7: Distinguish among documentary evidence, oral testimony, and
Q8: In some instances, where documentary evidence is
Q9: Probably the most common method of proving
Q11: A defendant who was in incarcerated at
Q12: In order for a document to be
Q13: What is the rationale for authorizing the
Q14: In order to introduce a 911 call
Q15: A statement by a coroner contained within