Multiple Choice
In McKeehan v. State, defendant McKeehan was found guilty by a jury of robbery with a firearm, grand theft, aggravated assault with a firearm, and kidnapping with intent to commit a felony. All of these crimes were purportedly committed at a Sleep Inn Motel in Orlando. At the trial, an officer was permitted to orally identify the defendant from a security video from a different motel where other crimes had occurred. The video from the other motel was not shown, and the officer's identification of the defendant was important to the state's case. The reviewing court decided that:
A) the state's failure to introduce the original was not an error.
B) the state statute requiring the original video to be admitted has no exceptions.
C) because there was no evidence that the video was taken correctly at the second motel, they were improperly admitted.
D) because the original video should have been admitted, there was a violation of the best evidence rule, and the reviewing court reversed the conviction.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q14: In order to introduce a 911 call
Q15: A statement by a coroner contained within
Q16: Federal Rule 1002 refers to the principle
Q17: Examples of documentary evidence that must be
Q18: The best evidence rule:<br>A) is of recent
Q20: When considering the admissibility of documentary evidence:<br>A)
Q21: Do rules of evidence, with respect to
Q22: Secondary evidence:<br>A) is not admissible in a
Q23: What is the basis for the rule
Q24: Rule 902 of the Federal Rules of