Essay
In Gonzalez v. State, a defendant had been charged with killing a woman during a robbery. When police arrived, the woman victim was in shock, scared, and bleeding, but she was still conscious and asking for help when police responded. She told officers that she had been shot by a kid who lived across the street, and she noted that the kid stole her truck. The woman knew her situation was grave, but she never told anyone that she knew that was dying. Over a defendant's objection, a police officer offered her dying declaration at the defendant's murder trial. Should the trial court have permitted the woman's statement to the officer to be admitted as a dying declaration? What arguments should you make if you want the woman's statement kept from admission at trial? All things considered, should dying declarations be permitted, because a defendant cannot cross-examine the dead witness?
Correct Answer:

Answered by ExamLex AI
The trial court should have permitted th...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Answered by ExamLex AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q2: There are four general reasons that support
Q3: A dying declaration is a statement by
Q4: When considering the history of the hearsay
Q5: Why are business and public records usually
Q6: In Gonzalez v. State, the Texas defendant
Q8: When a police officer takes the stand
Q9: What is a dying declaration? Must a
Q10: In some instances, evidence is offered not
Q11: The hearsay rule:<br>A) has no exceptions, because
Q12: What four reasons are advanced as to