Multiple Choice
In considering the duration of the marital testimonial privilege, the courts have generally agreed that:
A) utterances made in confidence subsequent to the divorce of the parties are nevertheless protected by the privilege.
B) when the spouses are divorced at the time of the trial, the purposes of the marital testimonial privilege no longer apply.
C) when the courts consider the marital testimonial privilege and its duration, it makes little difference whether the parties are divorced or separated.
D) if the previous spouses continue to live with each other after the divorce, the marital testimonial privilege continues to exist as if they were still married.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q28: What is the present status of the
Q29: In State v. Bergmann, the defendant was
Q30: Under what conditions does the state have
Q31: What is the rationale for the testimonial
Q32: The principle of the attorney-client privilege:<br>A) is
Q34: Traditionally, the courts in most states recognized
Q35: Some testimony, even though relevant, is not
Q36: What is the policy basis of the
Q37: When considering privileged communications, there are two
Q38: The case of Trammel v. United States,