When Considering Evidence of Conduct of the Accused Shortly Before

Multiple Choice

When considering evidence of conduct of the accused shortly before the offense, the courts have held that:

A) such evidence is not admissible.
B) evidence of circumstances preceding the crime may be relevant, but the prejudicial value of the evidence outweighs any probative value since even defendants have rights to privacy.
C) the evidence is generally admissible if inconsistent with the accused's innocence and is probative of guilt.
D) it is not admissible when offered by the prosecution, but is admissible when offered by the defense.