Multiple Choice
Assume that a defendant had voluntarily consumed a large quantity of alcohol to the point of extreme intoxication and was alleged to have committed a criminal act. Evidence concerning voluntary intoxication of the accused at the time of the crime:
A) is never admissible because a defendant may not rely on intoxication to prove his lack of guilt.
B) is admissible because voluntary intoxication is an excuse for the commission of a crime.
C) is not admissible because all states have statutes prohibiting the use of such evidence.
D) may be admissible if the purpose is to demonstrate that a particular state of mind required for guilt of the charged crime could not have existed due to the level of intoxication.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q18: Under the Neil v. Biggers test for
Q19: What factors did the Daubert v. Merrell
Q20: What procedure is followed in court in
Q21: An alleged victim has made an identification
Q22: Generally, physical or photographic evidence that tends
Q24: Under what circumstances is evidence of conduct
Q25: The prosecution in Commonwealth v. Prashaw had
Q26: Assume that a defendant had told several
Q27: Where an objection to the admission of
Q28: Generally, evidence of a person's character or