As a General Rule, Evidence Relating to Out-Of-Court Experiments and Scientific

Multiple Choice

As a general rule, evidence relating to out-of-court experiments and scientific evidence that has a direct bearing on the issues in the case:

A) is admissible, subject to the discretion of the trial court.
B) should not be admitted in criminal cases because it has no relevancy to the issues.
C) cannot be excluded for other reasons if it meets the relevancy test.
D) is not admissible if the testimony concerns the testing of firearms to show patterns of powder and shot made upon an object at a certain distance.