Multiple Choice
As a general rule from the cases, the burden of introducing proof rests with the:
A) defendant to prove that he or she did not commit the crime by introducing proof that successfully disputes the government's proof.
B) defendant in cases where the defendant has alleged an affirmative defense.
C) prosecution to prove all of the elements of the crime or crimes by the level of proof of preponderance of the evidence.
D) Both b and c responses indicate correct statements.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q33: Assume that state law does not require
Q34: In some instances, the burden of proving
Q35: In the case of Martin v. Ohio,
Q36: In the case of Lindsey v. Commonwealth,
Q37: If specific intent is an element of
Q38: In a criminal case, the state does
Q39: Define burden of proof, burden of going
Q40: If, in an assault case, the accused
Q42: What is meant by the statement "The
Q43: Why did the Supreme Court of the