Multiple Choice
In the case of Funk v. United States, which considers the traditional rule prohibiting a wife from testifying for or against her husband in a criminal case, the court discussed the development of the rules of evidence. There the court found that:
A) rules of evidence, once established, cannot be changed by court decision.
B) the common law relating to the rules of evidence is not immutable, but is flexible and may be adapted to varying conditions.
C) common law rules of evidence that developed under the English system must be followed in the United States.
D) the court must continue to enforce the traditional rule, which prohibits a wife from testifying for her husband in a criminal case.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q4: What is real evidence? Give one example.<br>12,
Q5: Evidence that requires inferences to be made
Q6: How does the Romanesque legal system differ
Q7: The rules of evidence that have been
Q8: The Greek legal system influenced the Roman
Q10: In an effort to obtain more uniformity
Q11: Documentary evidence would include which of the
Q12: In Funk v. United States, the United
Q13: Relevant evidence is generally admissible, unless excluded
Q14: How have some Congressional statutes changed the