Essay
Al was a well-respected attorney in a small town. A couple retained Al to represent them on the purchase of a home. Before closing, Al informed the couple of payments that they were required to make by check at the closing. Among the required payments the attorney told the couple to make were a check for $1,500 to Bob Brown and a check for $610 to Susan Lee. The attorney explained that the check to Brown was for a survey of the property and the check to Lee was for termite control work that the couple had authorized.??The checks were issued and taken by Al who promised to deliver them. Al did not, however, deliver them. Instead, Al forged the indorsements of the respective payees and cashed the checks. When Al was later arrested on a similar matter, the couple learned what had happened.??The couple made a claim against its bank for reimbursement, claiming the bank was not authorized to pay these checks because they had not been effectively negotiated to the bank. When the facts came to light, no person named Bob Brown had done a survey on the property, but the termite work had been done by Lee. Decide both cases.
Correct Answer:

Verified
The couple will not recover on the check...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q5: The words "without recourse" on an indorsement
Q6: Order paper is converted into bearer paper
Q7: Indorsements may be classified in terms of
Q8: The order or bearer character of the
Q9: The transfer and collection of negotiable instruments
Q11: A holder is also known as an
Q12: If an instrument bears a restrictive indorsement,
Q13: A qualified indorsement qualifies the effect of
Q14: The warranties made by an unqualified indorser
Q15: A person who acquires the instrument on