Essay
Roberts leased a duplex from Hughes. Later, without Hughes' knowledge, Roberts sublet half of the duplex to Carrera. Carrera did not take proper care of the premises and her part of the duplex was substantially damaged as a result of her negligent use and abuse. Upon discovering the situation, Hughes notified Roberts that he was holding him responsible for any and all damages to Carrera's portion of the duplex, and that Roberts was to bear the costs of returning the premises to the original state of repair. Roberts replied that he had sublet to Carrera in good faith, had no further dealings with Carrera after the sublet agreement, had no knowledge of negligence, and could not be held liable for damages caused by another. Can Roberts be held liable?
Correct Answer:

Verified
Yes. Roberts is liable. In the absence o...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q28: If taxes or assessments on leased premises
Q29: If a leased building is destroyed, the
Q30: A provision in a residential lease stating
Q31: If a tenant remains in possession after
Q32: For an implied warranty of habitability to
Q34: A provision in a lease giving the
Q35: In the event a tenant breaches the
Q36: A landlord has the right to enter
Q37: In a lease agreement, the person who
Q38: A tenancy for an indefinite time period