Multiple Choice
There are two stock issues for arguing factual propositions. The first stock issue asks: "What information confirms or denies the alleged relationship between the subject and the predicate of the primary inference?" What is the second stock issue?
A) By what criteria is the alleged factual relationship located in a hierarchy of acceptable fact?
B) What techniques of reasoning should be used to demonstrate this relationship?
C) What are the consequences of accepting this relationship as probably true?
D) What hierarchy of acceptable fact does the relationship exist in?
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q10: An inference is an earlier attempt to
Q11: When a proposition of value is phrased
Q12: You should always define , such as
Q13: Whether we are arguing fact, value, or
Q14: Analyzing the immediate cause of interest in
Q16: Why is it helpful to define terms
Q17: Defining value-laden terms such as "beneficial," "harmful,"
Q18: Because policy argumentation is concerned with change
Q19: A stock issue of factual argumentation is
Q20: What are the stock issues in factual