Multiple Choice
In arguing propositions of fact, as an opponent you have two strategies for responding to the advocate's arguments, denial and extenuation. What must you examine to decide whether strategies of denial and extenuation will be appropriate for refuting the advocate's arguments?
A) How the advocate uses presumption.
B) How the advocate defined terms.
C) How the advocate's placement of arguments of effect, significance, and inherency organized the message.
D) How the advocate's arguments satisfy the requirements of the stock issues of factual argumentation.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: Extenuation arguments claim that the advocate has
Q26: Although argumentation as inquiry, or knowledge seeking,
Q27: In factual argumentation, arguments about effect focus
Q28: The opponent must always respond to the
Q29: arguments focus on the circumstances surrounding the
Q31: In developing arguments to advocate and oppose
Q32: As an advocate developing a prima facie
Q33: In factual argumentation, arguments about inherency focus
Q34: As you investigate the historical background of
Q35: Denial arguments suggest the advocate's argument is