In Using Extenuation Arguments to Refute the Advocate's Case, the Opponent

Multiple Choice

In using extenuation arguments to refute the advocate's case, the opponent argues

A) that the relationship inferred by the advocate is based on a limited understanding of the circumstances.
B) that a more complete understanding of the circumstances leads to a different inference.
C) that unusual circumstances warrant a conclusion of than the one normally drawn when these facts are present.
D) All of the above