Multiple Choice
As an opponent for a policy proposition, which of the following questions should you NOT ask yourself in establishing your strategy of opposition?
A) What is the advocate's burden of proof and has she met it?
B) Has the advocate implied one or more values that she asks the audience to accept without explaining the value(s) ?
C) Has the advocate used the "traditional" need-plan-advantage structure for developing the proposition?
D) Does the advocate's reason for change contain assumptions that are unwarranted because she has not offered adequate proof and reasoning for these assumptions?
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: As an opponent, you might use the
Q24: One strategy available to the opponent in
Q25: Assume that the advocate's proposal for change
Q26: One type of argument which can be
Q27: Assume that the advocate's proposal for a
Q29: In arguing the "reason for change" in
Q30: In policy argumentation, the advocate's policy proposal
Q31: The pattern of organization for policy argumentation
Q32: In a circumvention argument, the opponent of
Q33: In policy argumentation, part of the advocate's