Multiple Choice
Ron and Roderick were American employees at a publishing firm. The company employed 22 workers, most of who were French or spoke French. There were constant complaints pertaining to language issues by Ron and Roderick. The company subsequently adopted an "English-only" policy, requiring employees to speak in English while conducting business. The French employees and the union then filed a lawsuit against the company, alleging that the English-only policy violated Title VII. In this case, the court held that there was no violation of Title VII because:
A) there wasn't enough evidence that the rule was actually implemented.
B) there were no reasonable grounds to justify that provisions of Title VII were violated.
C) there were not a sufficient number of employees to support the union.
D) there were a large number of English speaking employees in the company.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q3: Richard worked as an assembly line worker
Q4: Explain the Immigration Reform and Control Act
Q5: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
Q6: Under Title VII, the federal government has
Q7: All of the following individuals are subject
Q9: Under which rule of Title VII, does
Q10: The U.S. Attorney General has the authority
Q11: Section 702(a)provides an exception under Title VII
Q12: Title VII does not currently prohibit employment
Q13: What are the two methods for a