Multiple Choice
In the Pistorius case, why did the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) overturn the IAAF's decision declaring Pistorius ineligible to compete in IAAF-sanctioned track events due to his use of a prosthetic leg?
A) The IAAF had been procedurally unfair in its decision-making process
B) The IAAF had engaged in disability discrimination against Pistorius in contravention of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
C) The IAAF interpreted its own rule incorrectly and failed to meet its burden of proof
D) A and C
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: The international federations (IFs), which have the
Q9: The USOC and the other NOCs are
Q10: Supreme Court precedent in San Francisco Arts
Q11: U.S. courts are willing to rule on
Q12: Chapter 13 discusses the ways in which
Q14: In general, NGBs and NOCs must comply
Q15: The USOC and the American NGBs are
Q16: The United States revised and updated its
Q17: CAS generally applies a principle of presumed
Q18: Which of the following documents codify the