Explain Warren's Argument That Abortion Is Morally Permissible

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Warren's argument for the moral permissibility of abortion is based on the idea that the fetus does not have the same moral status as a person. She argues that while the fetus is a potential person, it does not have the same rights as an actual person. Warren uses the analogy of a person waking up to find themselves connected to a famous violinist who needs their body to survive. While it would be kind to stay connected to the violinist, Warren argues that it would not be morally required, as the person has the right to bodily autonomy.

One objection to Warren's argument is that it does not adequately address the moral status of the fetus. Critics argue that the fetus should be considered a person with rights, and therefore abortion would be morally impermissible. They may also argue that the violinist analogy does not accurately represent the relationship between a pregnant woman and her fetus.

In response to this objection, Warren might argue that the fetus's potential personhood does not outweigh a woman's right to bodily autonomy. She might also point out that the violinist analogy is meant to illustrate the concept of bodily autonomy, rather than directly compare the fetus to a violinist.

Overall, whether or not one finds Warren's argument convincing may depend on their views on the moral status of the fetus. Those who believe that the fetus is a person with rights may find her argument unconvincing, while those who prioritize bodily autonomy may find it compelling. Ultimately, the moral permissibility of abortion is a complex and deeply personal issue that may not have a clear-cut answer.

Explain Warren's Argument That Abortion Is Morally Permissible

Essay

Correct Answer:
Answered by ExamLex AI

Explain Warren's Argument That Abortion Is Morally Permissible

Essay

Correct Answer:Answered by ExamLex AIShow Answer

Correct Answer:
Answered by ExamLex AI