Essay
Case Study
Imagine a small town in which there has recently been a rash of murders that all bear the marks of the same culprit. The police investigation has gone nowhere and the town's sense of order is starting to break down. Residents are demanding that the sheriff find a culprit and threatening to exact vigilante justice on perceived criminals until a culprit is found. Given that the real murderer is unknown, the sheriff sees that she can only prevent chaos and bloodshed by framing someone who likely is not the murderer.
The sheriff has someone in mind who could be easily framed-a local man, Jim, who has been in and out of jail for other violent crimes like assault and robbery. He has no family and no one in town would protest if he were to be locked up. Moreover, he is a believable culprit and so would be easy to frame. The sheriff is fairly sure that he is not actually the murderer, so she would likely be framing someone who, while not innocent overall, is innocent of these particular crimes. But she is not sure what else she can do to keep the peace.
-Does utilitarianism tell us that the sheriff is morally required to frame Jim? If so, is this a problem for utilitarianism? If not, how would the utilitarian explain this verdict?
Correct Answer:

Answered by ExamLex AI
Utilitarianism is a moral theory that st...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Answered by ExamLex AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q18: Mill argues that, according to the utilitarian
Q19: Explain the Greatest Happiness Principle. Then, come
Q20: Explain the objection to utilitarianism that it
Q21: According to Mill, which of the following
Q22: Mill maintains that, in the long run,
Q24: Most utilitarians regard the principle of utility
Q25: Talk about:<br>-Principle of utility
Q26: Talk about:<br>-Act utilitarianism
Q27: Talk about:<br>-Rule consequentialism
Q28: Mill maintains that the business of ethics