Multiple Choice
From 1990, the Havasupai gave DNA samples to a geneticist in the hopes that research could inform them about their risk factors or provide treatment options for Type 2 diabetes. Unbeknownst to participants, researchers later used these DNA samples to study diseases such as alcoholism and schizophrenia. What are the ethical implications of the researchers' actions?
A) Informed consent from participants was violated.
B) There were no ethical mistakes because participants were not additionally harmed.
C) Confidentiality of participants was violated.
D) With the additional analyses, there was no longer minimal risk to participants and exposing participants to more than minimal risk was unethical on the part of the researchers.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q14: When there is a conflict of interest
Q15: Which of the following is true about
Q16: Research concerning educational practices using observational procedures
Q17: Researchers should strive to design studies that
Q18: Once participants have consented to provide materials
Q20: David wants to recruit full-time working adults
Q21: In which section of the IRB application
Q22: Consent forms should contain as much background
Q23: An advantage of a clearly written IRB
Q24: While _ at the conclusion of the