Multiple Choice
assume that Councillor 3 has to take a family member to the emergency room and has a very poor experience with the level of medical care provided at the local hospital. This leads her to view improving medical care as a higher priority than improving education in the municipality, if money is to be spent improving any programs. Councillors 1 and 2 do not change their preference orderings. Thus, the councillors now have the following preference orderings over the spending choices:
Councillor 1: Education Medical Tax cut
Councillor 2: Medical Tax cut Education
Councillor 3: Tax cut Medical Education
Assume that the councillors hold a round-robin tournament that pits each alternative against every other alternative in a series of pair-wise votes. The winner is the alternative that wins the most contests. Based on this information, answer the following four questions.
-Given the preference orderings listed above, what would the result be of a pair-wise contest between the spending choices medical and tax cut?
A) education
B) medical
C) tax cut
D) it would be a tie
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: What is Codorcet's paradox?<br>A) An option that
Q8: Figure 1 illustrates an election in which
Q9: Imagine that three city council members
Q10: Which of the following conditions are included
Q11: If a voter chooses an alternative that
Q13: assume that Councillor 3 has to
Q14: As the number of individuals and/or the
Q15: From the point of view of someone
Q16: Suppose that some event occurs that causes
Q17: What's the difference between a preference ordering