Essay
construct theories for which the following interpretation is a model (i.e. construct at least two sentences which are true under the given interpretation).
Domain = {1, 2, 3, ..., 28, 29, 30}
a = 1 e = 21
b = 2 f = 23
c = 4 g = 27
d = 19 h = 29
Ex = {2, 4, 6, ..., 28, 30}
Ox = {1, 3, 5, ..., 27, 29}
Px = (2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29}
Sxyz = The set of all triples such that the first is the sum of the second and third
{<2, 1, 1>, <3, 1, 2>, <3, 2, 1>, <4, 1, 3>, <4, 2, 2>, <4, 3, 1>, <5, 1, 4>, ... }
-Construct a theory of at least three sentences, at least one of which uses an existential quantifier and at least one of which uses a universal quantifier.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q251: 1. (∀x)(∃y)Axy ⊃ (∀x)(∃y)Bxy<br>2. (∃x)(∀y)∼Bxy<br>-Which of the
Q252: select the best translation into predicate logic,
Q253: select the best English interpretation of the
Q254: use:<br>b: Britain <br>c: Charles <br>e: Elizabeth <br>t:
Q255: select the best translation into predicate logic,
Q257: 1. (∀x)[Ax ⊃ (∀y)(By ⊃ Cxy)]<br>2.
Q258: 1. Ha • Ia<br>2. (∀x)[(Hx •
Q259: use:<br>b: Britain <br>c: Charles <br>e: Elizabeth <br>t:
Q260: use:<br>d: Diego <br>s: Sean<br>Dx: x is on
Q261: 1. (?x){Ax ? [Bx • Bf(x)]}<br>2. ?Bf(f(e))