Essay
construct theories for which the following interpretation is a model (i.e. construct at least two sentences which are true under the given interpretation).
Domain = {1, 2, 3, ..., 28, 29, 30}
a = 1 e = 21
b = 2 f = 23
c = 4 g = 27
d = 19 h = 29
Ex = {2, 4, 6, ..., 28, 30}
Ox = {1, 3, 5, ..., 27, 29}
Px = (2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29}
Sxyz = The set of all triples such that the first is the sum of the second and third
{<2, 1, 1>, <3, 1, 2>, <3, 2, 1>, <4, 1, 3>, <4, 2, 2>, <4, 3, 1>, <5, 1, 4>, ... }
-Construct a theory of at least three sentences which uses all three predicates and at least three different constants.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q135: select the best translation into predicate logic,
Q136: 1. Fab • (∀x)(Fax ⊃ x=b)<br>2. ∼Fac<br>-Which
Q137: 1. (∀x)(∀y)(Bxy ≡ Dyx)<br>2. (∃x)Bxf(x)<br>-Which of the
Q138: provide a conterexample in a finite domain
Q139: (∀x)[Px ⊃ (∃y)Rxy] ⊃ [(∀x)(∀y)∼Rxy ⊃ ∼(∃x)Px]<br>-Consider
Q141: consider the following domain, assignment of
Q142: select the best English interpretation of the
Q143: 1. (∀x){Px ⊃ (∃y)[Py • f(x)=y]}<br>2. Pa
Q144: (∃x)(∃y)(Axy • x=y) ⊃ (∃x)Axx<br>-Consider assuming '(∃x)(∃y)(Axy
Q145: translate each sentence of predicate logic into