Multiple Choice
If neuroscience makes progress, then the mind is the brain. If the mind is soul-like, then rational thought is inexplicable. If neuroscience does not progress, then the mind is soul- like. If philosophy of mind is vacuous, then the mind is not the brain and rational thought is explicable. So, philosophy of mind is not vacuous.
-Working backward from the conclusion of this argument, which of the following is the most likely justification of the last step of the derivation?
A) Cont
B) MT
C) Taut
D) DS
E) CD
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q216: determine whether the argument is valid
Q217: Either arithmetic and logic are both
Q218: (P <span class="ql-formula" data-value=" \lor
Q219: 1. (P <span class="ql-formula" data-value="
Q220: [(G • H) ⊃ I] ⊃ [G
Q222: Construct a derivation to prove that
Q223: 1. ∼A ≡ B<br>2. A •
Q224: determine whether the given proposition is
Q225: If moral theories measure outcomes or
Q226: 1. M ⊃ J<br>2. M ⊃