Multiple Choice
What seems to be a crucial difference between using ERP analysis and eye tracking to evaluate subjects' moment-by-moment experiences of spoken language?
A) ERPs can capture unconscious processing, whereas eye-tracking studies can only provide information about conscious linguistic processes.
B) Eye tracking provides researchers with data about moment-by-moment processing of language, whereas ERP data only allows them to view discrete time points within the process.
C) ERP experiments allow researchers to test more abstract or complex language, whereas eye-tracking studies are limited to stimuli that can be easily represented in pictures.
D) Eye tracking is an older and more established technique among researchers, whereas ERP is still considered to be in its developmental infancy.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q36: Which of the following is a confound,
Q37: Do individual differences affect people's language parsing
Q38: Kamide and colleagues (2003) investigated predictive language
Q39: Refer to the figure.<br><img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TBO1216/.jpg" alt="Refer to
Q40: The mouse the cat chased keeled over.
Q41: How is working memory involved in the
Q42: What are garden path sentences? Provide an
Q44: Chambers et al. (2004) used an eye
Q45: In their 1998 study, John Trueswell and
Q46: During the Stroop test, subjects<br>A) experience interference