Solved

Which Rule of Inference Makes the Conclusion of This Argument [F? (G∨H)]?(I∨J)?[F? (G∨H)]⋅[F? (G∨H)]?(I∨J)[F ? ~(G \vee H)] ? (I \vee J) ?{[F ? ~(G\vee H)] · [F ? ~(G \vee H)]} ? (I \vee J)

Question 14

Multiple Choice

Which rule of inference makes the conclusion of this argument follow from its premise?
[F? (G∨H) ]?(I∨J) ?[F? (G∨H) ]⋅[F? (G∨H) ]?(I∨J) [F ? ~(G \vee H) ] ? (I \vee J) ?{[F ? ~(G\vee H) ] · [F ? ~(G \vee H) ]} ? (I \vee J)


A) transportation
B) tautology
C) association
D) commutation

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Q9: Which rule of inference makes the conclusion

Q10: Matching:<br>-"p · q, ? p" is the

Q11: The method of proving invalidity by assigning

Q12: You can replace [(p · q) ?r]

Q13: What is the rule of inference by

Q15: Simplification is symbolically represented by p ?

Q16: By which rule of inference does

Q17: For the following valid argument, state

Q18: Material implication states that <span class="ql-formula"

Q19: Matching:<br>-An argument is proved invalid when its