Multiple Choice
One reason that N uses the chariot example is to illustrate how
A) a whole is the sum collection of its parts.
B) a whole can be identified with its most essential parts.
C) there are no such things as wholes which exist over and above their parts.
D) it makes no sense at all to talk about chariots as existing in the first place.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q3: All Brahmanical schools of Indian philosophy agree
Q4: The Buddha taught a kind of pessimism
Q5: According to Nāgasena, what are the three
Q6: <img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TBO1325/.jpg" alt=" claims that particularities
Q7: According to the Buddhist doctrine of impermanence,<br>A)
Q9: Explain what the Buddha meant by the
Q10: For the <img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TBO1325/.jpg" alt="For the
Q11: One reason why a chariot cannot be
Q12: In the Chandogya Upanisad, the god Indra
Q13: Even if we are able to acquire