Essay
The Chinese philosophical debates about logic and language are never far from political and moral concerns. They recognized the importance of being precise with words as well as, for the Daoists, inconsistency and vagueness of words. Bring in Chad Hansen's discussion on the philosophy of language in the Zhuangzi and the Laozi to facilitate comparison with early Wittgenstein and the logical positivists. Chad Hansen, A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation, Oxford University Press (1992). Alternatively, this is a good opportunity to discuss propaganda and rhetoric as ways to facilitate (or dissolve) moral and societal cohesion.
Correct Answer:
Answered by ExamLex AI
The Chinese philosophical debates about ...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Answered by ExamLex AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q8: Discussion of wúwéi benefits from the idea
Q9: What does Protagoras promise to teach Hippocrates?<br>A)
Q10: In his comic play The Clouds, Aristophanes
Q11: Characterize Socrates as he is portrayed in
Q12: Is it more important to be just
Q14: Compare Heraclitus, who says that we are
Q15: Antiphon argues that<br>A) most of the things
Q16: Explain the difference between nomos and physis,
Q17: The Zhuangzi can be used to problematize
Q18: The key idea in rhetoric is that<br>A)