Solved

According to Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole V

Question 20

True/False

According to Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. Scott, the federal exclusionary rule does not bar the introduction of evidence seized in violation of parolees' Fourth Amendment rights at parole revocation hearings.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Q15: In _, the Court argued an informal

Q16: Explain the four theories of parole and

Q17: Griffin v. Wisconsin is the major Supreme

Q18: Discuss the Fourth Amendment rights of probationers

Q19: There is no constitutional right to a

Q21: The Supreme Court held in Ohio Adult

Q22: The privilege theory of parole was repudiated

Q23: In _, the Court held that an

Q24: In Gagnon v. Scarpelli, the Court distinguished

Q25: Which theory of parole is used as