Essay
Each of the following situations involves a possible violation of the independence requirements of the provincial institutes Rules of Professional Conduct. For each situation, (1) decide whether the Rules have been violated, and (2) briefly explain how the situation violates (or does not violate) the Rules.
A) Mike Lednicky, public accountant, is a partner in the Oshawa office of Arthur & Thompson, public accountants. Mike's brother is employed as an inventory warehouse supervisor (an audit-sensitive position) by Sweeny Appliances, a publicly-held company in Manitoba. Sweeny Appliances is one of Arthur & Thompson's audit clients. Neither Mike nor the Oshawa office of Arthur & Thompson is involved in the audit of Sweeny Appliances.
Violation? Yes No
Correct Answer:

Verified
A)No violation.Although partners in a pu...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q6: "Independence" in auditing means<br>A)remaining aloof from the
Q11: You are having lunch with a former
Q11: In applying professional judgment,the auditor must be
Q13: Some independence rules apply to all assurance
Q15: Which of the following situations would be
Q15: The requirement for an attitude of skepticism
Q19: Financial statement users cannot be expected to
Q39: PAs are members of a professional association
Q96: Raul,PA,received a call from his friend Cristobal
Q104: Which of the following situations best describes