Multiple Choice
The jury concluded that the driver of the brown car ran a red light at the intersection of Maple Drive and First Street while proceeding south on Maple Drive. Joan testified that she was driving her blue Toyota and headed west on First Street. She further testified that, as she approached Maple Drive, the light was green and that, as she proceeded through the intersection, a brown car collided with her Toyota. The jury accepted Joan's testimony and concluded that the driver of the brown car negligently caused the collision. Evidence shows that Bob is the owner of the brown car. Based on these facts alone, was Bob negligent?
A) Yes, because Bob is the owner of the vehicle.
B) Yes, because the driver of the brown car was negligent.
C) No, because Joan should not have driven through the intersection at that time.
D) No, because no evidence shows that Bob was the driver of the brown car.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: The following conversation took place between Consuela,
Q10: The United States Constitution is to the
Q11: A crime is to a criminal as
Q12: The following facts were established during a
Q13: An anthropologist was working on an archeological
Q15: A surgeon performed abdominal surgery on a
Q16: Sunrise Travel is a Florida corporation that
Q17: Bigtime Business is a Minnesota corporation that
Q18: Teri is a paralegal who works for
Q19: The common law is to statutes as