Multiple Choice
Assertion (A) : X, because of unsoundness of mind, not knowing the nature of the act attacks Y, who in self-defence and in order to ward of the attack, hits him thereby causing him hurt. Y does not commit an offence. Reason (R) : Y had a right of private defence against X under Section 98 of the Indian Penal Code. Of the above statements.
A) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
B) Both A and R are true and R is NOT a correct explanation of A
C) A is true but R is false
D) A is false but R is true.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q12: Give the correct response?<br>A)Sec. 34 needs active
Q13: To apply Sec. 34 there must be
Q14: "Common intention" under Sec. 34 does mean:<br>A)Pre-concert
Q15: There persons A, B and C went
Q16: Under Section 46 of IPC, death denotes<br>A)Death
Q18: What is the difference between Sc. 34
Q19: Consider the following statements: To justify as
Q20: Defence of Insanity is developed on which
Q21: A person who commits an offence in
Q22: Section 76 and Section 79 of IPC