Multiple Choice
Give correct response. A, the accused was an educated person living in a town where medical attendance was available, chained up his brother, who was suffering from periodical fits of violent insanity, for over three months in a unnecessarily cruel manner. Held that:
A) The accused acted in good faith because every reasonable man would have acted in a similar way in those circumstances.
B) The accused acted in good faith for the benefit of his brother and was, therefore, not liable.
C) The accused acted in good faith because whatever he did was, in his judgment, in the interest of his brother and he reasonably believed that it was for his good, more over the chaining was without any malice or mens rea.
D) The accused did not act in good faith because he failed to exercise due care and attention in as much as he did not avail of the medical care, instead hastened to subject the victim to undue cruelty.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: Give correct response. In most of the
Q24: Point out incorrect response. Mistake means and
Q25: According to Sec. 79 -- "Nothing an
Q26: Nothing is an offence which is done
Q27: Voluntary intoxication:<br>A)Makes an offence more serious or
Q29: Sec. 81 says that nothing is an
Q30: Which of the following statements is correct?<br>A)Inevitable
Q31: Section 97 of IPC extends the right
Q32: Every person has a right to defend
Q33: Give incorrect response. The following are essentials