Multiple Choice
Give best response. Z is carried off by a tiger. A fires at the tiger knowing it to be likely that the shot may kill Z, but not intending to kill Z and in good faith intending Z's benefit, A's bullet gives Z a mortal wound:
A) A is not liable because he never intended to kill and o person can be held liable unless the act resulting in death was done with the intention of causing death.
B) A is not liable because he is entitled to the defence under section 92. In this case the act was done in good faith for the benefit of the child (i.e. to save him from being taken off by the tiger) the likelihood of the harm was known but was not intended.
C) A is liable for murder and is not entitled to the defence under section 92 that 'an act done in good faith, for the benefit of a person without consent is not an offence'.
D) A is liable for murder because he knew that the shot may kill Z, in homicide intention to kill is not always necessary merely knowledge that the act is likely to cause death is sufficient.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q35: Voluntary drunkenness is an excuse in case
Q36: Give the correct response : An intoxicated
Q37: Point out incorrect response. The following are
Q38: Give the correct response<br>A)A headmaster who administers
Q39: A drunken person killed his uncle. It
Q41: Give correct response. A, in a great
Q42: A person suffering from fever killed his
Q43: Give the correct response<br>A)In England a child
Q44: In the above stated case the accused<br>A)Is
Q45: Give incorrect response. The defence of necessity