Multiple Choice
In case of A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 was found conflicting with the two Articles:
A) Articles 14 and 17
B) Articles 19 and 21
C) Articles 23 and 25
D) Articles 23 and 32.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Related Questions
Q7: Under Article 32 a writ petition can
Q8: The defence of 'consent' is not available
Q9: Abetment of any offence, if the act
Q10: The protection given to the accused under
Q11: In the case of People's Union for
Q13: Operation of consent to all offences, short
Q14: The maxim 'de minimus non curat lex'
Q15: The right guaranteed under Article 32 can
Q16: Under section 89 the consent in respect
Q17: Under which one of the following cases