One Mrs Komai Bought a Car on the Name of Her

Multiple Choice

One Mrs. Komai bought a car on the name of her daughter, Kiran, who is a minor, and got the insurance policy transferred on her name (Mrs. Komal) . The car met with an accident on two counts and she file for a claim on both the counts, from the insurance agency. She acknowledged the receipt of the money as Kiran. The insurance company her prosecuted under Section 467 of the IPC alleging fraud on the appellant's part?

A) Mrs. Komal is guilty of forgery because she made the insurance company believed that she is Kiran
B) Mrs. Komal is not guilty of forgery because the said deceit did not secure her any advantage as the entire transaction was that of Mrs. Komal
C) Mrs. Komal is guilty of forgery because she signed all the papers in the name of Kiran
D) Both (A) and (C)