Multiple Choice
In a case P, a married lady was found in a pool of blood and lying on the ground. On the way to hospital in ambulance she breathed her last. It transpired in the evidence that when P was seated outside her jhuggi, her brother came near her and challenged as to why she made a complaint against her own brother R to the police, Her other brother R and Sharma too came. There was an altercation wherein Sharma stabbed her to death. Which of the following is true regarding this particular case?
A) As to the vicarious liability of R & C, that the accused Sharma was not carrying an open knife in his hand and there was no evidence to show that this fact was in the knowledge of the other accused.
B) Sharma had not given any call to his brothers that P should be stabbed to death. Otherwise all the accused had not come together and for that reason it is difficult to assume that all had a prior meeting of mind to cause the death of their sister.
C) The words used by C were to teach P a lesson for making false accusations. Keeping in view the close relationship, it is difficult to assume that all of them had shared the common intention to kill P. Under these circumstances, there is no reason to rope C and R by aid of Section 34, IPC and they were acquitted.
D) All of them
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q40: The defence of 'consent' is restrictive in
Q41: The basic principle which runs through Section
Q42: Abetment of any offence when one act
Q43: Dishonest misappropriation of property, knowing that it
Q44: Several persons assemble at the door of
Q45: The law on private defence in India:<br>A)is
Q47: The consent is not a valid consent
Q48: Right of disabled employee as equal citizens
Q49: Every person has a right of private
Q50: Which of the following is false of