In Barabin V

Multiple Choice

In Barabin v. AstenJohnson, where Barabin sued for damage suffered from exposure to asbestos, the appeals court held that:

A) the plaintiff's expert witnesses did not meet the reliability standard for the admission of expert testimony
B) the plaintiff had no case because his failed to follow the proper procedures regarding timely filing of depositions
C) the defendant was liable for damages due to proximate cause overcoming superseding events related to the illness
D) the defendant could only be sued in federal court
E) none of the other choices are correct