In Barabin V

Multiple Choice

In Barabin v. AstenJohnson, where Barabin sued for damage suffered from exposure to asbestos, the appeals court held that the testimony of the plaintiff's expert witnesses was not legally permissible evidence because:

A) the expert witness's testimony did not meet the Daubert reliability standard
B) the plaintiff failed to fill out the expert witness testimony forms
C) the expert witness for the plaintiff refused to give a deposition as requested by defendant
D) the expert witness was not from the United States, so could not qualify
E) none of the other choices are correct