Multiple Choice
SBD Kitchens and a client, Jefferson, got into a dispute about work done for the Jeffersons, who sued. The contract contained an arbitration clause, so the court ordered the parties to go to arbitration. The arbitrator found that SBD breached its contract. He also found that the Jeffersons defamed SBD by spreading negative information about the company. The Jeffersons were ordered to pay damages of almost $200,000. They appealed to the court of appeals. It held that:
A) the award was affirmed.
B) the award for breach of contract was affirmed but not the judgment for defamation, as it was not related to the contract. The arbitrator exceeded his authority.
C) the award was overturned as a "obvious error in law" concerning defamation.
D) the decision was valid but the amount awarded was excessive, so must be reduced.
E) none of the other choices are correct.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q121: If a party refuses to comply with
Q122: Failure by the trial judge to admit
Q123: Mediators may be required, in some states,
Q124: Many international contracts involving the sale of
Q125: A court order for a certain amount
Q127: The screening process used in selecting the
Q128: In Barabin v. AstenJohnson, where Barabin sued
Q129: Written interrogatories are useful for obtaining information:<br>A)
Q130: A judicial system that requires parties to
Q131: Arbitrators may award punitive damages as part