Multiple Choice
The government seized a large amount of cash (as the "instrumentality" of the crime) being carried out of the country by a couple who failed to report that they were leaving the country with more than $10,000. The Supreme Court held that the seizure of the cash was:
A) an unconstitutional search and seizure
B) a constitutional taking based on the "significant interest" of the government
C) a constitutional search and seizure
D) a constitutional fine, not excessive because of the extent of drug money laundering
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q362: Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona concerned whether
Q363: In South-Central Timber Development v. Wunnicke, concerning
Q364: If a government rule applies differently to
Q365: The Seventh Amendment of the U.S. Constitution:<br>A)
Q366: In New York v. Burger, a junkyard
Q368: Apportionment is meant to protect a company
Q369: Foreign commerce:<br>A) may be subject to discriminatory
Q370: In Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona, concerning
Q371: The Supreme Court in Hughes v. Oklahoma
Q372: If Congress imposes a regulation on an