In Squish La Fish V

Multiple Choice

In Squish La Fish v. Thomco Specialty Products, involving an adhesive that did not work as hoped in product packaging, Squish La Fish sued the adhesive seller for negligent misrepresentation because:

A) Squish La Fish was the foreseeable user of Thomco's representations concerning the adhesive
B) Squish La Fish felt that Thomco gave false information about the adhesive's removability
C) Squish La Fish felt that it relied on Thomco's false information about the adhesive
D) all of the specific choices
E) none of the specific choices